What’s in the Story?

It’s noon and your stomach starts rumbling—you’re hungry. You want to get some Japanese ramen for your empty stomach. Stepping out of your house, you are hit by a wave of heat.

“Maybe I should get a cold lunch like sushi instead,” you think. “Hot ramen may not be good on this hot day.” Other people had the same idea, and the restaurant has already sold all of its sushi for the day. You go off to find something else that is cold for lunch.

Weather often affects your food choice. You might drink more hot chocolate in the winter, and eat more ice cream in the summer. Something similar can happen in the sea. When temperatures warm up, some organisms may be found in greater numbers. Changes like these impact what is being eaten in the ocean. But what would happen if an organism was “sold out” in the sea?

Researchers discuss how the changing climate can alter the feeding relationships in the sea in the PLOS Biology article “Climate Change Could Drive Marine Food Web Collapse Through Altered Trophic Flows and Cyanobacterial Proliferation.” They may have some sad news – the marine food web could collapse. And the clock is ticking.

Hot and Acidic Oceans?

Standing in a corn field, you see a machine drive by, picking corn off the plants. A lot of work that used to be done by hand is now done using machinery. This trend started in the late 1700s and increased heavily by the 1900s. The increase in machines and power usage was called the Industrial Revolution. All of this production put off a lot of air pollution.

After the Industrial Revolution, the amount of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in air rose drastically. This increase in CO₂ caused many problems in today’s world, including two big ones: climate change and ocean acidification. Because of these changes, our oceans are getting warmer and more acidic. How will this affect relationships in the sea?

A Taste of Trophic Levels

Species are highly connected to one another. The changing climate can alter their relationships. To understand how these relationships change, let’s look at how we divide organisms in a food web. Different levels of the food web, or food chain, are called trophic levels. “Trophic” just means related to eating. So let’s look at the different eating levels of a web.

Primary producers (like plants) are at trophic level one. They use sunlight to make sugars to feed themselves. The next level has herbivores, or plant eaters. These include large animals like deer, and tiny animals, like zooplankton. The third level is filled by animals that eat other animals. For example, small fish eat zooplankton. Some food webs have a higher levels, with predators that eat animals from the level below.

In these feeding relationships, the energy stored in prey flows to predators, up through trophic levels. This is known as a trophic flow. And because each organism may have multiple food choices, a food web is created, instead of just specific food chains.

Humans are part of marine food webs, as marine organisms, like fish, are part of our diet. Billions of people depend on fish for nearly one-fifth of the animal proteins they eat. With such a dependence on marine food webs, we need to understand how the changing climate may affect the oceans.

Studying Mini Marine Worlds

Researchers built 12 mesocosms to study how changing climate affects marine food webs. The word “mesocosm” comes from two Greek words: meso– means “medium”, and –cosm means “world”. They are “medium worlds” that researchers build, with habitats and organisms inside. Researchers can then experiment within these man-made worlds. For this study, the mesocosms were about the size of a hot tub, which holds around 1,800 liters of water (almost 500 gallons).

The researchers split the mesocosms into four groups, or treatments. In the first, they matched current conditions in the ocean. In the second, they increased the CO₂ level to 900 ppm (“OA” treatment). In the third, they increased the temperature by 2.8°C (“T” treatment). And in the last, they combined those CO₂ and temperature increases (“OAT”). They also called OAT the “business-as-usual” condition, as this is where our environment will end up in the year 2100 if we keep polluting as much as we do now.

Altered Trophic Flows: Road Diversions

Researchers treated the mesocosms for over four months, and measured the effects on the amounts of plants, invertebrates, and fish. They weighed the organisms at different trophic levels. Then they determined the energy flow by comparing the weights among levels.

Together, warming and higher acidity decreased energy flow from the producers (trophic level one) to the herbivores (level two). Warming also reduced energy flow to higher trophic levels. There were clearly some changes or “barriers” that slowed energy flow between trophic levels.

Researchers also found that the combination of warming and acidity increased the energy stored (known as biomass) in producers. More plants? It sounds like good news, right? However, this combination could decrease biomass at higher trophic levels. Researchers found that although there was more energy in producers, organisms in higher trophic levels could not use the extra energy. This is why energy flow among the trophic levels was reduced.

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Energy in producers must end up somewhere else, if it is not available to higher trophic levels. These altered energy paths are like road diversions in your city. The carriers cannot efficiently deliver the goods to the receivers, and the energy ends up on a different route.

But what makes this happen? What are the “diversions” that keep this energy from moving through the food web as it would usually?

Cyanobacteria Takes Over

Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) are bacteria that capture sunlight and make food. They are producers, in the first trophic level. However, to avoid being eaten, some cyanobacteria release toxins that can kill. Because of this, most herbivores prefer another food choice, turf algae.

In this study, researchers found that cyanobacteria grew better in warmer waters. But herbivores did not eat these cyanobacteria. This means more food was produced at trophic level one, but the energy did not flow to trophic level two or beyond.

Meanwhile, carnivores at higher trophic levels needed to eat more herbivores, because they had higher energy demands in warmer water. Herbivores were sandwiched; they ate less, but were eaten more. The death of herbivores eventually could no longer support the food web. The energy in uneaten cyanobacteria built up at the base of the food web, and organisms at higher levels didn’t have enough food to survive.

No More Business as Usual

In this way, future warming could very likely cause marine food webs to collapse. Considering how much we depend on fish, that’s a scary thought. If we don’t change our ways, and reduce our carbon emissions, our oceans may soon be less productive and vibrant than they are now.

Additional images via Wikimedia Commons. Coral reef by US Fish and Wildlife Service – Pacific Region. Coral reef at lighthouse by Holobionics.